Category: Communication

1. Jon Krakauer had climbed Seven hundred feet since he stepped of the glacier.
2. ” The rime was plastered over the rock to a thickness of two or three feet, so I kept plugging.” Which gave him to confidence to climb the crumbly armour of frost feathers.
3.  The frost feathers were five inches thick.
4.  Jon Krakauer had to climb back down because he was scared and he started hyperventilating.

Between page 140 and 143 shows that the climb was dangerous was he was saying how it’s steep and and he said something about him hurting his head. It also had a load of rocks on it.

this story is about two brothers who try to work out each other’s mysteries. The younger one who is still in school and still the smarter one try’s to work out what is going on and how for the older brother is isn’t very smart. He not smart at all he is quite dopey and goes on like he doesn’t really catch on to things as quick as his younger brother would. How the story starts is that the older brother gets a invitation to a school from one of his rich friend. They were asked to go to a private island where they would be paid £1000 and they wouldn’t need to pay for there travel if they go. The older brother was forced to bring his younger brother with him. With lots of mysteries that come with this invitation that the younger brother is going to have to try and deal with.

The differences between the experience of men and women in world war 1 was that with men most men were in the war so the women must have been scared for there husband while they were at home Probally do not the normal things a women would do at home. Such as cleaning, washing up up other stuff that will keep a women entertained. After all this they will Probally just go to sleep or reed a book maybe if they get bored because there’s nothing really to do at home while there husband is at war.

In our split scene that we done in one of them Henry was a woman st home during the war who was on the floor cleaning and just doing the usual work a woman would do. And on the other one there were Jameel conwright and Corey who were all men in the war and they were new to it and they ended up dying. And then at the end in the middle of the 2 split scenes I was a man who was standing there sending a letter to my wife to tell her that I am ok and to say I love her.

1. Chris Mcandless was talented with a French horn. He was also a member of the American University Symphony but quick
2. Chris Mcandless because his sister was better at it and also quit because he didn’t like been told what to do.
3. Chris and Carine spent hours building forts out of cushions and blankets.
4.  When Chris and Carine would walk down the streets holding hands.
5. In extract B it shows that Chris disliked the authority because it says how he quit doing what he liked doing just because he didn’t like being told what to do.
6. When Carine said she wanted to be like Chris it shows that Carine was quite jealous of the things that Chris use to do so she wanted to be able to do the things that Chris does.
7.  This shows that Chris doesn’t really like Carine as much as Carine likes Chris.
8.  This suggests that maybe Chris did like her but just didn’t want anyone knowing and people being able to know.
9.  What I know about Chris and Carine Mcandless relationship

1. Walts hair colour is like brown and grey.
2. Walt where’s a beard on his face
3. He where’s wire rimmed glasses.
4. The writer uses “that a kid with so much compassion could cause his parents so much pain”. To show the emotion that he is showing.
5. Walt shows that he is kind of like disappointed with his son and he makes him feel down for the things he does.
6. Walt says that he spent a lot of time with Chris even more then his other kids.
7. In this chapter 11 it shows that Walt how a air of authority because he’s quick strict and he don’t really joke around.

His full name was Eugen Berthold Friedrich Brech he was born on the 10th of February 1898 in Augsburg he died on the 14th of August 1956 in east Germany. He had 4 children named Frank Banholzer, Hanne Stephan Brecht and Barbara Brecht – Schall

Eugen was a German poet writer, play writer and also a theatre director of the 20th century. From his late twenties Brecht remained a lifelong committed Marxist[citation needed] who, in developing the combined theory and practice of his “epic theatre”, synthesized and extended the experiments of Erwin Piscator and Vsevolod Meyerhold to explore the theatre as a forum for political ideas and the creation of a critical aesthetics of dialectical materialism.Statue of Brecht outside the Berliner Ensemble’s theatre in Berlin
Epic Theatre proposed that a play should not cause the spectator to identify emotionally with the characters or action before him or her, but should instead provoke rational self-reflection and a critical view of the action on the stage. Brecht thought that the experience of a climactic catharsis of emotion left an audience complacent. Instead, he wanted his audiences to adopt a critical perspective in order to recognise social injustice and exploitation and to be moved to go forth from the theatre and effect change in the world outside.[67] For this purpose, Brecht employed the use of techniques that remind the spectator that the play is a representation of reality and not reality itself. By highlighting the constructed nature of the theatrical event, Brecht hoped to communicate that the audience’s reality was equally constructed and, as such, was changeable.

in my drama scene the word we was using was cracker and that was the only word that we were aloud to use. So the audience had to try and figure out what we was doing in our scene by what we was doing. In our scene there was 3 of us and there was a drill Sargent who was telling us what we have to do. The reason why we done this is to make the audience focus on the scene and try and figure out what was going on without is using proper words.

At the start of the novel jekyll is presented as a calm and respectable man. They also describe Utterson as “cold, long, dusty, dreary and somehow loveable.”

Edward Hyde is not a separate personality living in the same body as Henry Jekyll “Hyde” is just Jekyll, having transformer his body into something unrecognisable, acting on unspecified urges that would be unseemly for someone his age and his social standing in Victoria London ( i.e some combination of violence and sex. Torture is especially mentioned.

Jekyll did not create a potion to remove the evil parts of nature. He made a potion that allowed him to express his urges without feeling guilty and without any consequences following his actions that will effect his good name. That’s also why his name is alter ego “Hyde” because Hyde is a disguise, to be worn and discarded like a thick cloak. He might as well called Edward his second name “Mr second” or “Mr mask.”

It is Important that if Dr Jekyll and mister Hyde. Dr Jekyll is a well respected Professor. Where as Hyde is a Lower class shlub. Hyde is also much younger then jekyll. It’s just the Hyde gets away with a lot of worse behaviour

Crucially, we never get Hydes point of view. Because it does not exist. Even when he looks like Hyde, Jekyll still thinks of himself as Jekyll in his testament that ends as the “strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Jekyll always talks about himself in Hydes body using “I” statements: I looked in the mirror and saw Hyde. The pleasures I sought in my disguise, I woke to see I had the hand of Hyde even when describing the murder of Sir Danvers. The worst thing he done as Hyde, Jekyll says “I mauled the unresisting body” and then “I saw my life to be forfeit”

But Jekyll’s an extremely unreliable narrator in this respect, because his own account belies this conclusion. Not just specifically when recounting the times that he was disguised as Hyde and he still refers to himself as Jekyll, but because “Henry Jekyll’s Full Statement of the Case” is written by Jekyll when he’s stuck in the body of Hyde. If there were ever a time for Hyde to exert himself, talk about himself as an autonomous being, it would be then. But he does not. Because he can’t. Because he does not exist.

The fundamental mistake most versions of Jekyll and Hyde make is not understanding that Jekyllwants to do all the things he does as Hyde. He loves being Hyde. He revels in the freedom of being Hyde and it’s only when the consequences catch up to him anyway that his duel personality becomes a problem for him.

This fundamental mistake leads to further misunderstandings. First, Jekyll is not good. He’s not bad, either, so much as Jekyll is a deeply repressed man who has hidden his violent and sexual urges. His biggest sin is that he wants to face no consequences for anything he does.

Second, Hyde is not the accidental result of an unrelated experiment. Hyde is the absolutely intended result of Jekyll’s experiment. Hyde is not Jekyll’s punishment for playing God. Hyde is Jekyll’s reward.

Third, Jekyll is not unaware or out of control when he’s Hyde. He does not wake up with no memory of what happened the night before. He remembers perfectly everything he does as Hyde, because he was in control the whole time.

And finally, Hyde is not a monster. He’s not the grotesque pink giant Hulk of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen or the super-fast, super-strong, super- handsome superhuman of Jekyll. He’s a nasty, brutish, and short ape-like man whose great advantage over Jekyll is that he’s young and seemingly lower class, and therefore can get away with a lot of shit.

Obviously, this rant is one hundred years too late to change the popular perception of this classic of horror. To most people, Jekyll and Hyde is the story of two completely separate personalities, one good and one evil, that share a body and are at war with each other, and that’s not going to change.

That said, I think the original is a much more complicated take on the nature of evil, society, shame, and repression than any that have followed it, and I’d love to see a version that really explored the appeal of Hyde to Jekyll. What would you do if you could be someone else for a night, do whatever you wanted to do, commit whatever sins you wanted to commit, without fear of consequences of any kind? Are we good because we want to be good, or are we good because we just don’t want to be punished?

The idea of evil as “that guy, over there, who takes over my body sometimes against my will” is too simple, and dissociative, and irresponsible. It’s the mistake Jekyll himself makes. Hyde is not someone else who commits Jekyll’s sins for him. Hyde does not exist. Jekyll commits all of his sins on his own.

Stephenson uses personification throughout the novel to develop the readers understanding of the characters of Jekyll and Hyde for some people to understand he uses this to describe Hyde as someone who has in-human characteristics.

he highlights the phrases to develop the atmoshpere of there relationship